
0
Signed Clients vs 2024
0
Cost Per Signed Client
0
Web-Form Conversions H1
ByteZero has run Google Ads for this California employer-defense practice continuously since 2021. The firm tracks Letters of Engagement — signed, paying clients — not clicks, which makes this the clearest return-on-spend record in our portfolio.
Recorded results
The client's own definition of a won client. 2026 is shown as first-half actual (113) plus a same-rate projection for the second half — the hatched bar is projected, not recorded.
Google Ads performance, 2023 – H1 2026
| Year | Ad spend | Conversions | Signed clients | Cost / signed client |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $70,167 | 1,232 | 132 | $532 |
| 2024 | $77,578 | 1,094 | 124 | $626 |
| 2025 | $85,194 | 953 | 162 | $526 |
| 2026 (H1) | $46,610 | 684 | 113 | $412 |
Practice Area
Employer Defense
Location
California
Key Result
Signed clients up 82% while cost per signed client fell 34%
Evidence
Named source systems
The number worth dwelling on is not the spend — that barely moved. It is the conversion-to-client rate. In 2024 the account produced 1,094 conversions and 124 signed clients: roughly one client for every nine conversions. In the first half of 2026 it produced 684 conversions and 113 signed clients — one client per six. Fewer raw leads, more paying clients. Average cost per click roughly doubled over the period, from about $6 to about $12, as we moved off cheap broad traffic. Paying twice as much per click and still cutting cost per signed client by a third is the entire thesis of this account, and it is the part that cannot be faked with a screenshot of a traffic graph.
Most legal advertising is judged on conversions, and conversions are easy to buy. This account had the opposite problem to solve: rising click prices in one of the most expensive paid categories in law, against a client who measures success only at the point a client actually signs. Buying more leads would have looked like progress and cost the firm money.
Measured the account against Letters of Engagement — signed clients — rather than form fills, so every optimisation was judged on revenue rather than volume
Moved budget away from cheap, broad traffic toward high-intent employer-defense and labor-dispute searches, accepting a higher cost per click for better-qualified enquiries
Rebuilt the web-form conversion path, which took first-half form conversions from 84 to 267 year over year
Held annual spend roughly flat from 2024 to 2025 while lifting signed clients 31%, proving the gain came from targeting rather than budget
Maintained continuous conversion tracking across the account since 2021, giving a four-year like-for-like record rather than a single favourable quarter
See What's Possible
We work exclusively with California law firms. Free audit, no obligation.
0
Signed Clients vs 2024
0
Cost Per Signed Client
0
Web-Form Conversions H1
The Services Behind This Result
Sources and method
Google Ads figures — spend, conversions, web-form conversions, cost per click and Letters of Engagement — are taken from the client's own campaign tracking workbook covering January 2023 through June 2026. LOE counts and cost per LOE for 2023 and 2024 are as stated in that workbook; 2025 and H1 2026 figures are summed from its monthly detail. The 2026 annualised figure doubles first-half actuals at a constant rate and is labelled as a projection wherever it appears. Website figures are from Google Analytics 4 for 1 August 2025 – 2 August 2026. Published with the client's permission.
Your Firm. Next.
Every firm featured here started with a free audit. Let's see what's possible for yours.